Please forgive the slight inconvenience in creating a new account. Due to juvenile delinquents spamming garbage to the site, we had to install a "Captcha", which can differentiate a spam bot from a human. Once you open your account, confirm it by returning the email, and identifying yourself, we will give you edit privileges. Just request them by leaving a message at click here.


From English WikiChiro
Jump to: navigation, search
Alternative medical systems - edit
NCCAM classifications
  1. Category:Alternative medical systems
  2. Category:Mind-body interventions
  3. Biologically based therapy
  4. Manipulative and body-based methods
  5. Energy therapy
See also

Naturopathy, or Naturopathic Medicine, is a form of alternative medicine based on a belief in vitalism, which posits that a special energy called vital energy or vital force guides bodily processes such as metabolism, reproduction, growth, and adaptation.[1] Naturopathic philosophy favors a holistic approach, and, like conventional medicine seeks to find the least invasive measures necessary for symptom improvement or resolution, thus encouraging minimal use of surgery and unnecessary drugs. According to the Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges, "Naturopathic medicine is defined by principles rather than by methods or modalities. Above all, it honors the body’s innate wisdom to heal."[2]

The term "naturopathy" is derived from Greek and Latin, and literally translates as "nature disease".[3] Modern naturopathy grew out of the Natural Cure movement of Europe.[4][5] The term was coined in 1895 by John Scheel and popularized by Benedict Lust,[6] the "father of U.S. naturopathy".[7] Beginning in the 1970s, there was a revival of interest in the United States and Canada in conjunction with the holistic health movement.[8][7]

Naturopathic practitioners are split into two groups, traditional naturopaths and naturopathic physicians.[3] Naturopathic physicians employ the principles of naturopathy within the context of conventional medical practices. Naturopathy comprises many different treatment modalities of varying degrees of acceptance by the conventional medical community; these treatments range from standard evidence-based treatments, to homeopathy and other practices.

Naturopathy is practiced in many countries, primarily the United States and Canada, and is subject to different standards of regulation and levels of acceptance. The scope of practice varies widely between jurisdictions, and naturopaths in unregulated jurisdictions may use the Naturopathic Doctor designation or other titles regardless of level of education.[9]

The philosophical and methodological underpinnings of naturopathy are sometimes in conflict with the paradigm of evidence-based medicine (EBM).[10] Many naturopaths have opposed vaccination based in part on the early philosophies that shaped the profession.


Monsignor Sebastian Kneipp, 1821–1897
Dr. Benedict Lust, 1872–1945

Some see the ancient Greek "Father of Medicine", Hippocrates, as the first advocate of naturopathic medicine, before the term existed.[11] The modern practice of naturopathy has its roots in the Nature Cure movement of Europe during the 19th century.[4][5] In Scotland, Thomas Allinson started advocating his "Hygienic Medicine" in the 1880s, promoting a natural diet and exercise with avoidance of tobacco and overwork.[12][13] The term sanipractor has sometimes been used to refer to naturopaths, particularly in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States.[7]

The term naturopathy was coined in 1895 by John Scheel,[6] and purchased by Benedict Lust, the "father of U.S. naturopathy".[7] Lust had been schooled in hydrotherapy and other natural health practices in Germany by Father Sebastian Kneipp; Kneipp sent Lust to the United States to spread his drugless methods. Lust defined naturopathy as a broad discipline rather than a particular method, and included such techniques as hydrotherapy, herbal medicine, and homeopathy, as well as eliminating overeating, tea, coffee, and alcohol.[8] He described the body in spiritual and vitalistic terms with "absolute reliance upon the cosmic forces of man's nature."[14]

In 1901, Lust founded the American School of Naturopathy in New York. In 1902, the original North American Kneipp Societies were discontinued and renamed "NATUROPATHIC Societies". In September 1919 the Naturopathic Society of America was dissolved and Dr. Benedict Lust founded the “American Naturopathic Association” to supplant it.[7][15][16] Naturopaths became licensed under naturopathic or drugless practitioner laws in 25 states in the first three decades of the twentieth century.[7] Naturopathy was adopted by many chiropractors, and several schools offered both Doctor of Naturopathy (ND) and Doctor of Chiropractic (DC) degrees.[7] Estimates of the number of naturopathic schools active in the United States during this period vary from about one to two dozen.</ref>[6][7]

After a period of rapid growth, naturopathy went into decline for several decades after the 1930s. In 1910, the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching published the Flexner Report, which criticized many aspects of medical education, especially quality and lack of scientific rigour. The advent of penicillin and other "miracle drugs" and the consequent popularity of modern medicine also contributed to naturopathy's decline. In the 1940s and 1950s, a broadening in scope of practice laws led many chiropractic schools to drop their ND degrees, though many chiropractors continued to practice naturopathy. From 1940 to 1963, the American Medical Association campaigned against heterodox medical systems. By 1958, practice of naturopathy was licensed in only five states.[7] In 1968, the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare issued a report on naturopathy concluding that naturopathy was not grounded in medical science and that naturopathic education was inadequate to prepare graduates to make appropriate diagnosis and provide treatment; the report recommends against expanding Medicare coverage to include naturopathic treatments.[17] In 1977, an Australian committee of inquiry reached similar conclusions; it did not recommend licensure for naturopaths.[18] As of 2009, fifteen of fifty U.S. states, Puerto Rico, the US Virgin Islands and the District of Columbia licensed naturopathic doctors,[19] and two states (WA, VT) require insurance companies to offer reimbursement for services provided by naturopathic physicians.[20][21]

Naturopathy never completely ceased to exist. Beginning in the 1970s, interest waxed in the United States and Canada in conjunction with the holistic health movement.[8][7]

Today, there are nine schools of Traditional naturopathy offering certificate or degree programs accredited by the American Naturopathic Medical Accredation Board [22] The National Board Of Naturopathic Examiners of the ANA currently recognizes two schools offering Doctor of Naturopathy Degree programs [23]

Naturopathic Medicine is represented with six accredited naturopathic medical schools and one candidate for accreditation in North America. In 1956, Charles Stone, Frank Spaulding, and W. Martin Bleything established the National College of Natural Medicine (NCNM) in Portland, Oregon in response to plans by the Western States Chiropractic College to drop its ND program. In 1978, Sheila Quinn, Joseph Pizzorno, William Mitchell, and Les Griffith established John Bastyr College of Naturopathic Medicine (now Bastyr University) in Seattle, Washington. That same year, the Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine was founded in Toronto, Canada. More recently founded schools include the Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine, founded in 1992, and Boucher Institute of Naturopathic Medicine, also founded in 1992. The University of Bridgeport in Connecticut grants ND degrees through the College of Naturopathic Medicine, and the National University of Health Sciences in Illinois recently developed a naturopathic program and is currently a candidate for accreditation.


Naturopathic ideology focuses on naturally-occurring substances, minimally-invasive methods, and encouragement of natural healing.Naturopaths generally favor an intuitive and vitalistic conception of the body, and complete rejection of biomedicine and modern science is common.[16] Prevention through stress reduction and a healthy diet and lifestyle is emphasized, and pharmaceutical drugs, ionizing radiation, and surgery are generally minimized. The philosophy of naturopathic practice is self-described by six core values.[24] Multiple versions exist in the form of the naturopathic doctor's oath,[25] various mission statements published by schools[26] or professional associations, and ethical conduct guidelines published by regulatory bodies:[27]

  1. First, do no harm; provide the most effective health care available with the least risk to patients at all times (primum non nocere).
  2. Recognize, respect and promote the self-healing power of nature inherent in each individual human being. (Vis medicatrix naturae, a form of vitalism).[28]
  3. Identify and remove the causes of illness, rather than eliminate or suppress symptoms (Tolle Causum).
  4. Educate, inspire rational hope and encourage self-responsibility for health (Doctor as Teacher).
  5. Treat each person by considering all individual health factors and influences. (Treat the Whole Person).
  6. Emphasize the condition of health to promote well-being and to prevent diseases for the individual, each community and our world. (Health Promotion, the Best Prevention)


Naturopaths use a wide variety of treatment modalities, focusing on natural self-healing rather than any specific method. Some methods rely on immaterial "vital energy fields", the existence of which has not been proven, and there is concern that naturopathy as a field tends towards isolation from general scientific discourse. The effectiveness of naturopathy as a whole system has not been systematically evaluated, and efficacy of individual methods used varies.

A consultation typically begins with a lengthy patient interview focusing on lifestyle, medical history, emotional tone, and physical features, as well as physical examination.[8] The traditional naturopath focuses on lifestyle changes and approaches that support the body's innate healing potential. Traditional naturopaths do not undertake to diagnose or treat diseases but concentrates on whole body wellness and facilitating the body healing itself. Traditional Naturopaths neither prescribe nor undertake to engage in the use of drugs, serums, potions, surgery or disease specific treatments or otherwise practice conventional medicine.[3] Practitioners of naturopathic medicine hold themselves to be primary care providers and in addition to various natural approaches seek to prescribe legend drugs, perform minor surgery and apply other conventional medical approaches to their practice. Naturopaths do not necessarily recommend vaccines and antibiotics, and may provide inappropriate alternative remedies even in cases where evidence-based medicine has been shown effective.[29][30] All forms of naturopathic education include concepts incompatible with basic science, and do not necessarily prepare a practitioner to make appropriate diagnosis or referrals.[30][31]


The particular modalities used by an individual naturopath varies with training and scope of practice. The demonstrated efficacy and scientific rationale also varies. These include: Acupuncture, Applied kinesiology,[32] Botanical medicine, Brainwave entrainment, Chelation therapy for atherosclerosis,[33] Colonic enemas, Color therapy,[32] Cranial osteopathy,[30] Hair analysis,[30] Homeopathy,[34] Iridology,[32] Live blood analysis, Nature cure - a range of therapies based upon exposure to natural elements such as sunshine, fresh air, heat, or cold, Nutrition (examples include vegetarian and wholefood diet, fasting, and abstention from alcohol and sugar),[35] Ozone therapy, Physical medicine (includes naturopathic, osseous, and soft tissue manipulative therapy, sports medicine, exercise and hydrotherapy), Psychological counseling (examples include meditation, relaxation, and other methods of stress management[35]), Public health measures and hygiene,[24] Reflexology,[32] Rolfing,[16] and Traditional Chinese medicine.

A 2004 survey determined the most commonly prescribed naturopathic therapeutics in Washington State and Connecticut were botanical medicines, vitamins, minerals, homeopathy, and allergy treatments.[34]


Many forms of alternative medicine, including naturopathy, homeopathy, and chiropractic are based on beliefs opposed to vaccination and have practitioners who voice their opposition. This includes non-medically trained naturopaths. The reasons for this negative vaccination view are complicated and rest, at least in part, on the early philosophies which shape the foundation of these professions. A survey of a cross section of students of a major complementary and alternative medicine college in Canada reported that students in the later years of the program opposed vaccination more strongly than newer students.[36]

A University of Washington study investigated insurance claim histories for alternative medicine use in relation to the receipt of vaccinations against preventable illnesses, grouped into children aged 1–2 years and 1–17 years. Both groups were significantly less likely to receive a number of their vaccinations if they visited a naturopath. The study found a significant association between visits to naturopaths with a reduced receipt of pediatric vaccinations and with increased infection by vaccine preventable illnesses.[29]


A consultation with a naturopathic practitioner typically begins with a lengthy patient interview focusing on lifestyle, medical history, emotional tone, and physical features, as well as physical examination.[8] Naturopathic practitioners can be split into two groups, traditional naturopaths and naturopathic physicians.[3][9][37][38]

Traditional naturopaths

Traditional naturopaths are represented in the US by two National Organizations, The American Naturopathic Association (ANA) founded in 1919 by Benedict Lust,[39]Script error representing about 5000 certified practitioners,[40]Script error and the American Naturopathic Medical Association (ANMA) founded in 1981 and representing about 4000 practitioners with several levels of certification.[41] The ANMA also recognizes MDs, DOs, and other medical professionals who have integrated naturopathy into their practices.

The level of naturopathic training varies among traditional naturopaths in the United States. Traditional naturopaths may complete non-degree certificate programs or undergraduate degree programs and can certify at a practitioner level with the American Naturopathic Medical Certification Board (ANMCB) and generally refer to themselves as Naturopathic Consultants.[42] There are also post graduate doctoral degrees for traditional naturopaths. Those completing a Doctor of Naturopathy (ND) degree from an ANMCB approved school can become a Board Certified Naturopathic Doctor.[42][43] Medical Doctors with supplemental training in Naturopathy can become National Board Certified Naturopathic Physicians through the ANMCAB.[42]

Traditional naturopathy as defined by the profession and the US Congress in the early twentieth century[44] does not require a license in the US.[45]Script error Because naturopathic medicine undertakes to engage in activities generally requiring a medical license, its practice is only legal in those 15 states that regulate the profession; however practitioners of naturopathic medicine may practice traditional naturopathy throughout the United States.[citation needed]

Doctors of Naturopathic Medicine

Naturopathic Medicine is represented in the US by the American Association of Naturopathic Physicians (AANP), which was founded in 1985 and has 2000 student, physicians, supporting, and corporate members.[46] Many naturopaths present themselves as primary care providers.[8][47] Doctor of Naturopathy (ND) training includes basic medical diagnostic tests and procedures such as medical imaging and blood tests, as well as vitalism and pseudoscientific modalities such as homeopathy.[8][48][33][49] The Council on Naturopathic Medical Education (CNME) also provides for the inclusion of optional modalities including minor surgery, natural childbirth, and intravenous therapy, though they are not generally licensed to perform these functions; these modalities require additional training and may not be within the scope of practice in all jurisdictions. This training includes therapies which are not required at a traditional MDs and DOs medical school, such as botanical medicine, clinical nutrition, naturopathic manipulation, and homeopathy.[50]

The core set of interventions defined by the Council on Naturopathic Medical Education and taught at all six accredited schools in North America includes:[47] acupuncture and Traditional Chinese medicine, botanical medicine, homeopathy, nature cure (a range of therapies based upon exposure to natural elements), nutrition, physical medicine, and psychological counseling.

Naturopathic medical license in most areas of North America requires graduation from one of the schools accredited by the Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges.


In jurisdictions where Naturopathic doctor (ND or NMD) or a similar term is a protected designation, naturopathic doctors must pass board exams set by the North American Board of Naturopathic Examiners (NABNE)[51] after completing academic and clinical training at a college certified by the Council on Naturopathic Medical Education (CNME).[47] Residency programs are offered at Bastyr University,[52] National College of Natural Medicine,[53] Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine,[54] and University of Bridgeport.[55] NDs are not required to engage in residency training.

In 2005, the Massachusetts Medical Society opposed licensure in that commonwealth based on concerns that NDs are not required to participate in residency, and are trained in inappropriate or harmful treatments.[31] The Massachusetts Special Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medical Practitioners rejected their concerns and recommended licensure.[56]

In the state of Washington, where naturopathic doctors are licensed comparably to primary care physicians,[57] many naturopathic doctors also accept insurance, with some plans offering the option of designating a naturopath as a primary care provider.[58] In Connecticut and Washington, state law requires insurance providers to provide some coverage of naturopathic services, while Oregon, another state with significant numbers of naturopathic doctors, does not.[58]

Other health care professionals

According to a 1998 taskforce report, some physicians are choosing to add naturopathic modalities to their practice,[59] and states such as Texas have begun to establish practice guidelines for MDs who integrate alternative and complementary medicine into their practice.[60] Continuing education in naturopathic modalities for health care professionals varies greatly but includes offerings for many professions, including physicians, physical therapists, chiropractors, acupuncturists, dentists, researchers, veterinarians, physician assistants, and nurses.[61] These professionals usually retain their original designation but may use terms such as 'holistic', 'natural', or 'integrative' to describe their practice. The American Naturopathic Medical Association (ANMA) and American Naturopathic Medical Certification and Accreditation Board (ANMCAB) has recognition and certification programs for Medical Doctors (MD) and Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DO) who have supplemented their education with naturopathic studies and integrate naturopathy into their practice.[42]


Naturopathy is practiced in many countries, primarily the United States and Canada, and is subject to different standards of regulation and levels of acceptance. The scope of practice varies widely between jurisdictions, and naturopaths in some unregulated jurisdictions may use the Naturopathic Doctor designation or other titles regardless of level of education.[9]

North America

In five Canadian provinces, fifteen US states and the District of Columbia, naturopathic doctors who are trained at an accredited school of naturopathic medicine in North America, are entitled to use the designation ND or NMD. Elsewhere, the designations "naturopath", "naturopathic doctor", and "doctor of natural medicine" are generally unprotected.[9]

In North America, each jurisdiction that regulates naturopathy defines a local scope of practice for naturopathic doctors that can vary considerably. Some regions permit minor surgery, access to prescription drugs, spinal manipulations, obstetrics and gynecology and other regions exclude these from the naturopathic scope of practice.[62]


Several Canadian provinces which license naturopathic doctors: British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, and Saskatchewan.[63] British Columbia has regulated naturopathic medicine since 1936 and is the only Canadian province that allows certified NDs to prescribe pharmaceuticals and perform minor surgeries.[64]

United States

Naturopathic doctors are not mandated to undergo residency between graduation and commencing practice,


There is no state licensure in Australia, rather the industry is self-regulated. There is no protection of title, meaning that technically anyone can practise as a naturopath. The only way to obtain insurance for professional indemnity or public liability is by joining a professional association, which can only be achieved by having completed an accredited course and gaining professional certification. Currently the only registered modalities of natural medicine in Australia are those relating to Chinese medicine, and only in the state of Victoria.[70]

In 1977 a committee reviewed all colleges of naturopathy in Australia and found that, although the syllabuses of many colleges were reasonable in their coverage of basic biomedical sciences on paper, the actual instruction bore little relationship to the documented course. In no case was any practical work of any consequence available. The lectures which were attended by the committee varied from the dictation of textbook material to a slow, but reasonably methodical, exposition of the terminology of medical sciences, at a level of dictionary definitions, without the benefit of depth or the understanding of mechanisms or the broader significance of the concepts. The committee did not see any significant teaching of the various therapeutic approaches favoured by naturopaths. People reported to be particularly interested in homoeopathy, Bach's floral remedies or mineral salts were interviewed, but no systematic courses in the choice and use of these therapies were seen in the various colleges. The committee were left with the impression that the choice of therapeutic regime was based on the general whim of the naturopath and, since the suggested applications in the various textbooks and dispensations overlap to an enormous extent, no specific indications are or can be taught.[18]


In India there is a 5½ year degree course offering a Bachelor of Naturopathy and Yogic Sciences (BNYS) degree. The first college of naturopathy was started in Hyderabad, Andra Pradesh by B. Venkatrao which offered a Diploma in Naturopathy (ND) and now has a full-time residential degree course. There are a total of 12 colleges in India, of which three are in the state of Karnataka, two colleges in Hyderabad, one each in Gujarat, Chattisgarh, and Madhya Pradesh and four colleges in the state of Tamil Nadu.[71]

Naturopathy and Yoga, as an Indian system of medicine, falls under the Department of AYUSH, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India.[72]

The Indian government established the "Central Council for Research in Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy” in 1969 as an autonomous organization under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. This organization was tasked to conduct scientific research into those branches of alternative medicine, until 1978. During this period, the development of Naturopathy was looked after by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare directly. In March 1978 the composite council was dissolved and replaced by four independent research councils, one each for Ayurveda and Siddha, Unani, homoeopathy and yoga and naturopathy.[73]

The National Institute of Naturopathy in Pune was established on 22 December 1986. It encourages facilities for standardization and propagation of the existing knowledge and its application through research in naturopathy throughout India. This institute has a governing body, with the Union Minister for Health as its president.[74]

United Kingdom

Naturopathy is not regulated in the United Kingdom. The largest registering body, the General Council & Register of Naturopaths, recognises three courses in the UK, two being taught at osteopathic schools: the British College of Osteopathic Medicine; The College of Osteopaths Educational Trust; and one at the University of Westminster School of Integrated Health under the auspices of the BSc Health Science (Naturopathy) course.[citation needed]

There are also the Association of Naturopathic Practitioners and The British Naturopathic Association.

Evidence basis

Naturopathy lacks an adequate scientific basis under the methodology of evidence-based medicine (EBM).[10] Members of the medical community show a critical or rejecting view of naturopathy.[75] Traditional naturopathic practitioners surveyed in Australia perceive EBM as an ideologic assault on their beliefs in vitalistic and holistic principles.[10] They advocate the integrity of natural medicine practice.[10] Traditional natural medicine practitioners surveyed in Australia could have problems in understanding and applying the concept of EBM.[10] With greater scientific knowledge of naturopathy, better therapeutic approaches could be achieved, resulting in improved therapy models and an economic benefit for the health care system.[75] Naturopathic physicians have begun to contribute to research and adapt modern scientific principles into clinical practice, further developing and validating the profession.[76]

There are growing collaborative efforts between naturopaths and medical doctors to evaluate the safety and efficacy of naturopathic medicine in prevention and management of a broad range of common ailments, and to decide whether accessibility of naturopathic services will enhance patient health in a cost-effective way. In Germany a host of naturopathy alternative treatments are sold as reliable science such as reflexology.[77] However, even among those who support naturopathy consider reflexology unscientific.[77] Contrary to reflexology, scientifically genuine naturopathic methods are not an alternative, but a supplement to modern medicine.[77]

Naturopathy is criticized for its reliance on and its association with unproven, disproven, and other controversial alternative medical treatments, and for its vitalistic underpinnings.[49] As with any alternative care, there is a risk of misdiagnosis; this risk may be lower depending on level of training.[8][33] There is also a risk that ailments that cannot be diagnosed by naturopaths will go untreated while a patient attempts treatment programs designed by their naturopath. National Science Board (April 2002). "Science and engineering indicators". Arlington, Virginia: National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences. </ref>[78][79] Natural methods and chemicals are not necessarily safer or more effective than artificial or synthetic ones; any treatment capable of eliciting an effect may also have deleterious side effects.

"Non-scientific health care practitioners, including naturopaths, use unscientific methods and deception on a public who, lacking in-depth health care knowledge, must rely upon the assurance of providers. Quackery not only harms people, it undermines the ability to conduct scientific research and should be opposed by scientists", says William T. Jarvis.[80]

K. C. Atwood writes, in the journal Medscape General Medicine, "Naturopathic physicians now claim to be primary care physicians proficient in the practice of both "conventional" and "natural" medicine. Their training, however, amounts to a small fraction of that of medical doctors who practice primary care. An examination of their literature, moreover, reveals that it is replete with pseudoscientific, ineffective, unethical, and potentially dangerous practices."[48] In another article, Atwood writes that "Physicians who consider naturopaths to be their colleagues thus find themselves in opposition to one of the fundamental ethical precepts of modern medicine. If naturopaths aren't to be judged "nonscientific practitioners," the term has no useful meaning. An article by a physician exposing quackery, moreover, does not identify its author as "biased," but simply as fulfilling one of his ethical obligations as a physician."[33]

According to Arnold S. Relman, the Textbook of Natural Medicine is inadequate as a teaching tool, as it omits to mention or treat in detail many common ailments, improperly emphasizes treatments "not likely to be effective" over those that are, and promotes unproven herbal remedies at the expense of pharmaceuticals. He concludes that "the risks to many sick patients seeking care from the average naturopathic practitioner would far outweigh any possible benefits."[81]

See also


  1. Sarris, J., and Wardle, J. 2010. Clinical naturopathy: an evidence-based guide to practice. Elsevier Australia. Chatswood, NSW.
  2. "The 6 Principles". Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges. Retrieved 2011-02-25. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 "Naturopathy: An Introduction" (PDF). National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2007. Retrieved 20 Nov 10. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 Brown PS (April 1, 1988). "Nineteenth-century American health reformers and the early nature cure movement in Britain". Medical History 32 (2): 174–194. PMID 3287059. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 Langley, Stephen (2007). "History of Naturopathy". Excerpt from The Naturopathy Workbook. UK: College of Natural Medicine (CNM). citations 
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 "Report 12 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A-97)". American Medical Association. 1997. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 Baer, H.A (2001). "The sociopolitical status of US naturopathy at the dawn of the 21st century". Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15 (3): 329–346. doi:10.1525/maq.2001.15.3.329. PMID 11693035. 
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 Frey, Rebecca (April 1). "Naturopathic medicine". Encyclopedia of Medicine. Gale (Cengage). Retrieved 20 Nov 10. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Iowa Board of Medicine policy statement on naturopathy
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 Jagtenberg T, Evans S, Grant A, Howden I, Lewis M, Singer J (2006). "Evidence-based medicine and naturopathy". J Altern Complement Med 12 (3): 323–8. doi:10.1089/acm.2006.12.323. PMID 16646733. 
  11. "What is Naturopathy?". 1998. 
  12. "How it all began". 
  13. John A S Beard (3 May 2008). "Views & Reviews Medical Classics A System of Hygienic Medicine (1886) and The Advantages of Wholemeal Bread (1889)". British Medical Journal 336 (336): 1023. doi:10.1136/bmj.39562.446528.59. 
  14. Benedict Lust, cited in: Whorton, James C. (2002). Nature cures: the history of alternative medicine in America. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. p. 224. ISBN 0-19-517162-4. 
  15. DC Department of Consumer Affairs, Corporate Division. (Continuously Incorporated since 1909)
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 Beyersteine, Barry L.; Susan Downie. "Naturopathy: a critical analysis". Retrieved 2009-03-21. 
  17. Cohen, Wilbur J (1968-12). Independent Practitioners Under Medicare: a report to the Congress. United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. 
  18. 18.0 18.1 Webb, Edwin C (1977). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Chiropractic, Osteopathy, Homoeopathy and Naturopathy. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. ISBN 064292287X. 
  19. "Licensed States & Licensing Authorities". American Association of Naturopathic Physicians. 2 July 2009. 
  20. "Every category of health care providers". 
  21. "Insuring Alternatives". Online Newshour (Public Broadcasting Service). 1996-07-03. Retrieved 2010-11-19. 
  22. American Naturopathic Medical Accreditation Board
  23. Nationan Board of Naturopathic Examiners of the ANA, List of approved programs, American Naturopathic Association, Washington DC
  24. 24.0 24.1 Clark, Carolyn Chambers; Gordon, Rena J. (1999). Encyclopedia of complementary health practice. Springer. pp. 57–58. ISBN 9780826112392. 
  25. "Naturopathic Doctor's Oath". 
  26. "Principles of Naturopathic Medicine". 
  27. "Guide to the Ethical Conduct of Naturopathic Doctors" (PDF). 
  28. Vincent Di Stefano (2006). Holism and Complementary Medicine: Origins and Principles. Allen & Unwin Academic. p. 107. ISBN 1741148464. 
  29. 29.0 29.1 Downey L, Tyree PT, Huebner CE, Lafferty WE (2009). "Pediatric vaccination and vaccine-preventable disease acquisition: associations with care by complementary and alternative medicine providers". Matern Child Health J 14 (6): 922–30. doi:10.1007/s10995-009-0519-5. PMID 19760163. PMC 2924961. 
  30. 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 Skolnick, Andrew A. (2004-11-18). "Voice of Reason: Licensing Naturopaths May Be Hazardous to Your Health". Live Science. Retrieved 2009-04-17. 
  31. 31.0 31.1 Gulla, Richard P. (May 11, 2005). "Massachusetts Medical Society Testifies in Opposition to Licensing Naturopaths". Massachusetts Medical Society. Retrieved 2009-04-17. 
  32. 32.0 32.1 32.2 32.3 Holly J. Hough, Catherine Dower, Edward H. O’Neil (September 2001) (PDF). Profile of a profession: naturopathic practice. Center for the Health Professions, University of California. p. 54. 
  33. 33.0 33.1 33.2 33.3 Atwood KC (March 26, 2004). "Naturopathy, pseudoscience, and medicine: myths and fallacies vs truth". MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine 6 (1): 33. PMID 15208545. 
  34. 34.0 34.1 Boon HS, Cherkin DC, Erro J, Sherman KJ, Milliman B, Booker J, Cramer EH, Smith MJ, Deyo RA, Eisenberg DM (2004). "Practice patterns of naturopathic physicians: results from a random survey of licensed practitioners in two US States". BMC Complement Altern Med 20 (4): 14. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-4-14. PMID 15496231. 
  35. 35.0 35.1 Jacqueline Young (2007). "8, 13". Complementary Medicine for Dummies. Chichester, England: Wiley. ISBN 9780470026250. OCLC 174043853. 
  36. Busse JW, Wilson K, Campbell JB (2008). "Attitudes towards vaccination among chiropractic and naturopathic students". Vaccine 26 (49): 6237–42. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.020. PMID 18674581. 
  37. The Platform of the American Naturopathic Association as drawn up by the Golden Jubilee Congress. July 27th – August 2nd, 1947
  38. Naturopathy Work Group. "Traditional Naturopathy Working Session Summary". Minnesota Department of Health. Retrieved 20 Nov 10. 
  39. American Naturopathic Association Certificate of Incorporation and Standing, Issued by the DC Department of Consumer Affairs, Corporate Division.
  40. The Encyclopedia of associations: 40th edition pp 1594
  41. American Naturopathic Medical Association
  42. 42.0 42.1 42.2 42.3 "American Naturopathic Medical Certification Board". =American Naturopathic Medical Certification Board. Retrieved March 12, 2010. 
  43. Paul Wendel (1951). Standardized Naturopathy. Brooklyn: Wendel. OCLC 6617124. 
  44. Chap. 352 @ 1326, 5.3936, Public No. 831 [also found as 45 St. 1339] dated February 27, 1929 and its clarifying amendments H.R. 12169 of May 5, 1930 & January 28, 1931 and corresponding House Report #2432 of January 30, 1930.
  45. Lawton v. Steele, 152 U.S. 133 (1894)
  46. American Association of Naturopathic Physicians
  47. 47.0 47.1 47.2 "Handbook of Accreditation for Naturopathic Medicine Programs" (PDF). Council on Naturopathic Medical Education. 2007. Retrieved 20 Nov 10. 
  48. 48.0 48.1 Atwood KC (2003). "Naturopathy: a critical appraisal". MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine 5 (4): 39. PMID 14745386. 
  49. 49.0 49.1 McKnight, P (2009-03-07). "Naturopathy's main article of faith cannot be validated: Reliance on vital forces leaves its practises based on beliefs without scientific backing". Vancouver Sun. Retrieved 2009-03-21. [dead link]
  50. "Academic Curriculum - Association of Accredited Naturopathic Medical Colleges". Retrieved 2009-09-22. 
  51. "NABNE". North American Board of Naturopathic Examiners. 
  52. "Degree : Naturopathic Medicine". Bastyr University. 2009-05-28. Retrieved 2009-09-22. 
  53. "Naturopathic Medicine Residency Program". National College of Natural Medicine. 2009-01-26. Retrieved 2009-09-22. 
  54. "Residencies at SCNM". Retrieved 2009-09-22. 
  55. "Residency Programs at Bridgeport". University of Bridgeport. Retrieved 2010-11-19. 
  56. Special Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medical Practitioners (2002). "Majority Report of the Special Commission on Complementary and Alternative Medical Practitioners: A Report to the Legislature". Retrieved 20 Nov 10Template:Inconsistent citations 
  57. "Chapter 18.36A RCW: Naturopathy". Retrieved 2009-09-22. 
  58. 58.0 58.1 "Naturopathic medicine" (PDF). 21 October 2004. 
  59. Finocchio LJ, Dower CM, Blick NT, Gragnola CM and the Taskforce on Health Care Workforce Regulation (October 1998). "Strengthening Consumer Protection: Priorities for Health Care Workforce Regulation" (PDF). San Francisco: Pew Health Professions Commission. Retrieved 2009-04-01. 
  60. Texas Administrative Code title 22, part 9 § 200.3, 1998
  61. Hough HJ, Dower C, O’Neil EH (September 2001). "Profile of a profession: naturopathic practice" (PDF). San Francisco: Center for the Health Professions, University of California, San Francisco. Retrieved 2009-04-21. 
  62. "Sunrise Review: Naturopathic Physicians" (PDF). State of Colorado. 2008. p. 19. 
  63. Canadian Association of Naturopathic Doctors
  64. CBC News - B.C. gives naturopaths right to prescribe drugs
  65. "Ley para Reglamentar el Ejercicio de la Medicina Naturopática en Puerto Rico [Law to Regulate the Practice of Naturopathic Medicine in Puerto Rico]" (in Spanish) (PDF). 30 December 1997. 
  66. "Licensed States & Licensing Authorities". American Association of Naturopathic Physicians. Retrieved 2010-10-06. 
  67. 67.0 67.1 67.2 "Reports to the Board of Trustees" (PDF). American Medical Association. 2006-11. Retrieved 2009-03-19. 
  68. "South Carolina Code of Laws Section 40-31-10". 
  69. "Tennessee Code 63-6-205". Tennessee State Legislature. 
  70. "Joint RACGP/AIMA Working Party Terms of Reference". The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. 
  71. "Naturopathic Colleges in India". Retrieved 2009-09-22. 
  72. Department of Ayurveda, Yoga & Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy (AYUSH)
  73. "Central Council for Research in Yoga and Naturopathy". Retrieved 2009-09-22. 
  74. National Institute of Naturopathy, Pune
  75. 75.0 75.1 Beck T (2001). "[On the general basis of naturopathy and complementary medicine]". Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd 8 (1): 24–32. PMID 11340311. 
  76. Smith MJ, Logan AC (2002). "Naturopathy". Med Clin North Am 86 (1): 173–84. doi:10.1016/S0025-7125(03)00079-8. PMID 11795088. 
  77. 77.0 77.1 77.2 Heide M, Heide MH (2009). "[Reflexology--nothing in common with scientific naturopathic treatments]". Versicherungsmedizin 61 (3): 129–35. PMID 19860172. 
  78. Wahlberg A (2007). "A quackery with a difference—new medical pluralism and the problem of 'dangerous practitioners' in the United Kingdom". Social Science & Medicine 65 (11): 2307–2316. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.024. PMID 17719708. 
  79. "Iridology is nonsense". , a web page with further references
  80. Jarvis, WT (August 1992). "Quackery: a national scandal". Clinical chemistry 38 (8B Pt 2): 1574–86. ISSN 0009-9147. PMID 1643742. 
  81. Relman, Arnold S. (2001-01-09). "Textbook of Natural Medicine". Quackwatch. Retrieved 2009-04-17. 

External links