Please forgive the slight inconvenience in creating a new account. Due to juvenile delinquents spamming garbage to the site, we had to install a "Captcha", which can differentiate a spam bot from a human. Once you open your account, confirm it by returning the email, and identifying yourself, we will give you edit privileges. Just request them by leaving a message at click here.


From English WikiChiro
Jump to: navigation, search
Classification and external resources
ICD-10 M41.
ICD-9 737
DiseasesDB 26545
MedlinePlus 001241

Scoliosis (/ˌskɒlɪˈsɪs/;[1] from Greek: σκολίωσις skoliosis "obliquity, bending"[2]) is a medical condition in which a person's spine is curved from side to side. Although it is a complex three-dimensional deformity, on an X-ray, viewed from the rear, the spine of an individual with scoliosis can resemble an "S" or a "?", rather than a straight line.[3]

Scoliosis is typically classified as either congenital (caused by vertebral anomalies present at birth), idiopathic (cause unknown, sub-classified as infantile, juvenile, adolescent, or adult, according to when onset occurred), or secondary to a primary condition.[4]

Secondary scoliosis can be the result of a neuromuscular condition (e.g., spina bifida, cerebral palsy, spinal muscular atrophy, or physical trauma) or syndromes such as Chiari malformation.[4]

Recent longitudinal studies reveal that the most common form of the condition, late-onset idiopathic scoliosis, is physiologically harmless and self-limiting even without treatment.[5][6] The rarer forms of scoliosis pose risks of complications.

Signs and symptoms

20th century illustration of a severe case of scoliosis.

People having reached skeletal maturity are less likely to have a worsening case. Some severe cases of scoliosis can lead to diminishing lung capacity, putting pressure on the heart, and restricting physical activities.

The signs of scoliosis can include:

  • Uneven musculature on one side of the spine
  • A rib prominence or a prominent shoulder blade, caused by rotation of the ribcage in thoracic scoliosis
  • Uneven hips, arms or leg lengths
  • Slow nerve action (in some cases)

Associated conditions

Scoliosis is sometimes associated with other conditions, such as Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (hyperflexibility, "floppy baby" syndrome, and other variants of the condition), Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease, Prader–Willi syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, kyphosis, cerebral palsy, spinal muscular atrophy, muscular dystrophy, familial dysautonomia, CHARGE syndrome, Friedreich's ataxia, fragile X syndrome,[7][8] proteus syndrome, spina bifida, Marfan's syndrome, nail–patella syndrome, neurofibromatosis, connective tissue disorders, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, hemihypertrophy, and craniospinal axis disorders (e.g., syringomyelia, mitral valve prolapse, Arnold–Chiari malformation), and amniotic band syndrome.

Scoliosis associated with known syndromes such as Marfans or Prader–Willi is often subclassified as "syndromic scoliosis".

Pain in the lower or upper shoulder blade, neck and buttock pain nearest bottom of the back. Nerve pinching of the leg may cause the legs to cut out.


An estimated 65% of scoliosis cases are idiopathic, about 15% are congenital and about 10% are secondary to a neuromuscular disease.[9]

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has no clear causal agent, and is generally believed to be multifactorial, although genetics are believed to play a role.[10][11] At least one gene, CHD7, has been associated with the idiopathic form of scoliosis.[11][12]

Studies in 2006 showed evidence of a linkage between idiopathic scoliosis and three microsatellite polymorphisms in the MATN1 gene (encoding for Matrilin 1, cartilage matrix protein), respectively consisting of 103, 101 and 99 base pairs, .[13]

Congenital scoliosis can be attributed to a malformation of the spine during weeks three to six in utero. It is a result of either a failure of formation, a failure of segmentation, or a combination of stimuli.[14] This incomplete and abnormal segmentation results in an abnormally shaped vertebra, at times fused to a normal vertebra or unilaterally fused vertebrae, leading to the abnormal lateral curvature of the spine.[15]

Secondary scoliosis due to neuropathic and myopathic conditions can result in a loss of muscular support for the spinal column which results in the spinal column being pulled in abnormal directions. Some conditions which may cause secondary scoliosis include muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, poliomyelitis, cerebral palsy, spinal cord trauma, and myotonia.[16][17] Scoliosis often presents itself, or worsens, during the adolescence growth spurt and is more often diagnosed in females than males.[citation needed]


Cobb angle measurement of a dextroscoliosis

Scoliosis is defined as a spinal curvature of more than 10 degrees to the right or left as the examiner faces the patient (in the coronal plane). Deformity may also exist to the front or back (in the sagittal plane).

Patients who initially present with scoliosis are examined to determine whether the deformity has an underlying cause. During a physical examination, the following are assessed to exclude the possibility of underlying condition more serious than simple scoliosis

The patient's gait is assessed, and there is an exam for signs of other abnormalities (e.g., spina bifida as evidenced by a dimple, hairy patch, lipoma, or hemangioma). A thorough neurological examination is also performed, the skin for café au lait spots, indicative of neurofibromatosis, the feet for cavovarus deformity, abdominal reflexes and muscle tone for spasticity.

During the examination, the patient is asked to bend forward as far as possible. This is known as the Adams forward bend test[18] and is often performed on school students. If a prominence is noted, then scoliosis is a possibility and the patient should be sent for an X-ray to confirm the diagnosis.

As an alternative, a scoliometer may be used to diagnose the condition.[19]

When scoliosis is suspected, weight-bearing full-spine AP/coronal (front-back view) and lateral/sagittal (side view) X-rays are usually taken to assess the scoliosis curves and the kyphosis and lordosis, as these can also be affected in individuals with scoliosis. Full-length standing spine X-rays are the standard method for evaluating the severity and progression of the scoliosis, and whether it is congenital or idiopathic in nature. In growing individuals, serial radiographs are obtained at three- to 12-month intervals to follow curve progression, and, in some instances, MRI investigation is warranted to look at the spinal cord.

The standard method for assessing the curvature quantitatively is measurement of the Cobb angle, which is the angle between two lines, drawn perpendicular to the upper endplate of the uppermost vertebra involved and the lower endplate of the lowest vertebra involved. For patients with two curves, Cobb angles are followed for both curves. In some patients, lateral-bending X-rays are obtained to assess the flexibility of the curves or the primary and compensatory curves.

Genetic testing

Genetic testing for AIS, which became available in 2009 and is still under investigation, attempts to gauge the likelihood of curve progression.[20]

Through a genome-wide association study, geneticists have identified single nucleotide polymorphism markers in the DNA that are significantly associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Fifty-three genetic markers have been identified. Scoliosis has been described as a biomechanical deformity, the progression of which depends on asymmetric forces otherwise known as the Heuter-Volkmann law.[21]


The traditional medical management of scoliosis is complex and is determined by the severity of the curvature and skeletal maturity, which together help predict the likelihood of progression.

The conventional options for children and adolescents are:[22]

  1. Observation
  2. Bracing
  3. Surgery

For adults, treatment usually focuses on relieving any pain:[23][24]

  1. Painkilling medication
  2. Bracing
  3. Exercise
  4. Surgery[25]

A growing body of scientific research testifies to the efficacy of specialized treatment programs of physical therapy, which may include bracing.[26]

Physical therapy

A physical therapist helps those who have experienced an injury or illness regain or maintain the ability to participate in everyday activities. For those with scoliosis, a physical therapist can provide assistance through assessment, intervention, and ongoing evaluation of the condition. This helps them manage physical symptoms so they can participate in daily activities like self-care, productivity, and leisure.

One intervention involves bracing. During the past several decades, a large variety of bracing devices have been developed for the treatment of scoliosis.[27] Studies demonstrate that preventing force sideways across a joint by bracing prevents further curvature of the spine in idiopathic scoliosis,[28] while other studies have also shown that braces can be used by individuals with scoliosis during physical activities.[29]

Other interventions include postural strategies, such as posture training in sitting, standing, and sleeping positions, and in using positioning supports such as pillows, wedges, rolls, and corsets.[30]

Adaptive and compensatory strategies are also employed to help facilitate individuals to returning daily activities.


Strengthening spinal muscles is a crucial preventative measure. This is because the muscles in the back are essential when it comes to supporting the spinal column and maintaining the spines proper shape. Exercises that will help improve the strength of the muscles in the back include rows, leg and arm extensions.[31] Furthermore, it was concluded that elastic resistance exercise was able to sustain the progression of spinal curvature.[32] This type of exercise is able to sustain progression by equalizing the strength of the torso muscles found on each side of the body.

Lay in the prone position and perform alternating shoulder flexions and hip extensions.


Disability caused by scoliosis, as well as physical limitations during recovery from treatment-related surgery, often affects an individual’s ability to perform self-care activities.[33] One of the first treatments of scoliosis is the attempt to prevent further curvature of the spine. Depending on the size of the curvature, this is typically done in one of three ways: bracing, surgery, or postural positioning through customized cushioning.[33][34][35] Stopping the progression of the scoliosis can prevent the loss of function in many activities of daily living by maintaining range of motion, preventing deformity of the rib cage, and reducing pain during activities such as bending or lifting.

Occupational therapists are often involved in the process of selection and fabrication of customized cushions. These individualized postural supports are used to maintain the current spinal curvature, or they can be adjusted to assist in the correction of the curvature. This type of treatment can help to maintain mobility for a wheelchair user by preventing the deformity of the rib cage and maintaining an active range of motion in the arms.[33]

For other self-care activities (such as dressing, bathing, grooming, personal hygiene, and feeding), several strategies can be used as a part of occupational therapy treatment. Environmental adaptations for bathing could include a bath bench, grab bars installed in the shower area, or a handheld shower nozzle.[36] For activities such as dressing and grooming, various assistive devices and strategies can be used to promote independence. An occupational therapist may recommend a long-handled reacher that can be used to assist self-dressing by allowing a person to avoid painful movements such as bending over; a long-handled shoehorn can be used for putting on and removing shoes. Problems with activities such as cutting meat and eating can be addressed by using specialized cutlery, kitchen utensils, or dishes.


Productive activities include paid or unpaid work, household chores, school, work, and play.[37] Recent studies in healthcare have led to the development of a variety of treatments to assist in the management of scoliosis thereby maximizing productivity for people of all ages. Assistive technology has undergone dramatic changes over the past 20 years; the availability and quality of the technology has improved greatly.[38] As a result of using assistive technology, functional changes may range from improvements in abilities, performance in daily activities, participation levels, and quality of life.[37]

A common assistive technology intervention is specialized seating and postural control. For children with poor postural control, a comfortable seating system that provides them with the support needed to maintain a sitting position can be essential for raising their overall level of well-being.[39] A child's well-being in a productive sense involves the ability to participate in classroom and play activities.[37] Specialized wheelchair seating has been identified as the most common prescription in the management of scoliosis in teenagers with muscular dystrophy.[40]

With comfortable wheelchair seating, teenagers are able to participate in classroom activities for longer periods with less fatigue. By tilting the seating position 20° forward (toward the thighs), seating pressure is significantly redistributed, so sitting is more comfortable. If an office worker with scoliosis can sit for longer periods, increased work output is likely to occur and could improve quality of life. Tall, forward-sloping seats or front parts of seats, and when possible with tall desk with the opposite slope, can, in general, reduce pains and the need of bending significantly while working or studying, and that is particularly important with braced, fragile, or tender backs. An open hip angle can benefit the used lung volume and respiration.[41][42]

For those not using a wheelchair, bracing may be used to treat scoliosis. Lifestyle changes are made to compensate for the proper use of spine braces.


Many physical symptoms can prevent a person from engaging in physical leisurely activities, such as chest pains, back pains, shortness of breath, and limited spinal movement. The occupational therapist's role is to help individuals with scoliosis manage these physical symptoms so they can participate in physical leisure activities.

Bracing is a common strategy recommended by an occupational therapist, in particular, for individuals engaging in sports and exercise.[29] An OT is responsible for educating an individual on the advantages and disadvantages of different braces, proper ways to wear the brace, and the day-to-day care of the brace.

To help a person manage heart and lung symptoms, such as shortness of breath or chest pains, an occupational therapist can teach the individual energy conservation techniques.[36] This includes scheduling routine breaks during the activity, as suitable for the individual. For example, an occupational therapist can recommend that a swimmer take breaks between laps to conserve energy. Adapting or modifying the exercise or sport is another way a person with scoliosis can do it.[36] Adapting the activity may change the difficulty of the sport or exercise. For example, it might mean taking breaks throughout an exercise. If a person with scoliosis is unable to participate in a sport or exercise, an OT can help the individual explore other physical activities that are suitable to his/her interests and capabilities. An occupational therapist and the person with scoliosis can explore enjoyable and meaningful participation in the sport/exercise in another capacity, such as coaching or refereeing.


Bracing is normally done when the patient has bone growth remaining and is, in general, implemented to hold the curve and prevent it from progressing to the point where surgery is recommended. In some cases with juveniles, bracing has reduced curves significantly, going from a 40 degrees (of the curve, mentioned in length above.) out of the brace to 18 degrees in it. Braces are sometimes prescribed for adults to relieve pain related to scoliosis. Bracing involves fitting the patient with a device that covers the torso; in some cases, it extends to the neck. The most commonly used brace is a TLSO, such as a Boston brace, a corset-like appliance that fits from armpits to hips and is custom-made from fiberglass or plastic. It is sometimes worn 22–23 hours a day, depending on the doctor's prescription, and applies pressure on the curves in the spine. The effectiveness of the brace depends not only on brace design and orthotist skill but on patient compliance and amount of wear per day. The typical use of braces is for idiopathic curves that are not grave enough to warrant surgery, but they may also be used to prevent the progression of more severe curves in young children, to buy the child time to grow before performing surgery, which would prevent further growth in the part of the spine affected.

Indications for Scoliosis Bracing: Scoliosis professionals determine the proper bracing method for a patient after a complete clinical evaluation. The patient’s growth potential, age, maturity, and scoliosis (Cobb angle, rotation, and sagittal profile) are also considered. Immature patients who present with Cobb angles less than 20 degrees should be closely monitored. Immature patients who present with Cobb angles of 20 degrees to 29 degrees should be braced according to the risk of progression by considering age, Cobb angle increase over a six-month period, Risser sign, and clinical presentation. Immature patients who present with Cobb angles greater than 30 degrees should be braced. However, these are guidelines and not every patient will fit into this table. For example, an immature patient with a 17-degree Cobb angle and significant thoracic rotation or flatback could be considered for nighttime bracing. On the opposite end of the growth spectrum, a 29-degree Cobb angle and a Risser sign three or four might not need to be braced because there is reduced potential for progression.[43]

Surgery is indicated by the Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) at 45 degrees to 50 degrees [44] and by the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) at a Cobb angle of 45 degrees.[45] SOSORT uses the 45-degree to 50-degree threshold as a result of the well-documented, plus or minus five degrees measurement error that can occur while measuring Cobb angles.

Scoliosis braces are usually comfortable for the patient, especially when it is well designed and fit; also after the 7 to 10-day break in period. A well fit and functioning scoliosis brace provides comfort when it is supporting the deformity and redirecting the body into a more corrected and normal physiological position.[46]

The Scoliosis Research Society's recommendations for bracing include curves progressing to larger than 25°, curves presenting between 30 and 45°, Risser sign 0, 1, or 2 (an X-ray measurement of a pelvic growth area), and less than six months from the onset of menses in girls.[47]

A Chêneau brace achieving correction from 56° to 27° Cobb angle

Progressive scolioses exceeding 25° Cobb angle in the pubertal growth spurt should be treated with a pattern-specific brace like the Chêneau brace and its derivatives, with an average brace-wearing time of 16 hours/day (23 hours/day assures the best possible result).

The latest standard of brace construction is with CAD/CAM technology. With the help of this technology, it has been possible to standardize the pattern-specific brace treatment. Severe mistakes in brace construction are largely ruled out with the help of these systems. This technology also eliminates the need to make a plaster cast for brace construction. The measurements can be taken in any place and are simple (and not comparable to plastering). In Germany, available CAD/CAM braces are known such as the Regnier-Chêneau brace, the Rigo-System-Chêneau-brace (RSC brace), and the Gensingen brace.[48] Many patients prefer the "Chêneau light" brace: It has the best in-brace corrections reported in international literature and is easier to wear than other braces in use today.[49][50] However, this brace is not available for all curve patterns.

Prior to 2013 the efficacy of bracing has not been definitively demonstrated in randomised clinical studies, with more limited studies giving inconsistent conclusions.[20] In 2013 the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST) published results establishing benefits of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. In the randomized cohort, 72% in the group instructed to wear a brace for 18 hours per day against 48% in the observation group sustained curve progression to under 50 degrees, the proxy used for not requiring surgery. Additionally results suggested that the more a patient wore the brace, the better the result.[51][52]


In progressive infantile and sometimes juvenile scoliosis, a plaster jacket applied early may be used instead of a brace. It has been proven possible[53] to permanently correct cases of infantile idiopathic scoliosis by applying a series of plaster casts (EDF: elongation, derotation, flexion) on a specialized frame under corrective traction, which helps to "mould" the infant's soft bones and work with their growth spurts. This method was pioneered by UK scoliosis specialist Min Mehta. EDF casting is now the only clinically known nonsurgical method of complete correction in progressive infantile scoliosis. Complete correction may be obtained for curves less than 50° if the treatment begins before the second year of life.[54][55]


Template:Double image

Surgery is usually recommended by orthopedists for curves with a high likelihood of progression (i.e., greater than 45 to 50° of magnitude), curves that would be cosmetically unacceptable as an adult, curves in patients with spina bifida and cerebral palsy that interfere with sitting and care, and curves that affect physiological functions such as breathing.

Surgery for scoliosis is performed by a surgeon specializing in spine surgery. For various reasons, it is usually impossible to completely straighten a scoliotic spine, but in most cases, significant corrections are achieved.

The two main types of surgery are:

  • Anterior fusion: This surgical approach is through an incision at the side of the chest wall.
  • Posterior fusion: This surgical approach is through an incision on the back and involves the use of metal instrumentation to correct the curve.

One or both of these surgical procedures may be needed. The surgery may be done in one or two stages and, on average, takes four to eight hours.

Spinal fusion with instrumentation

Spinal fusion is the most widely performed surgery for scoliosis. In this procedure, bone [either harvested from elsewhere in the body (autograft) or from a donor (allograft)] is grafted to the vertebrae so when they heal, they form one solid bone mass and the vertebral column becomes rigid. This prevents worsening of the curve, at the expense of some spinal movement. This can be performed from the anterior (front) aspect of the spine by entering the thoracic or abdominal cavities, or more commonly, performed from the back (posterior). A combination may be used in more severe cases, though the modern pedicle screw system has largely negating the need for this.[20]

In recent years all-screw systems have become the gold-standard technique for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pedicle screws achieve better fixation of the vertebral column and have better biomechanical properties than previous techniques, so enabling greater correction of the curve in all planes.[20]

Pedicle screw-only posterior spinal fusion may improve major curve correction at two years among patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)[20] as compared to hybrid instrumentation (proximal hooks with distal pedicle screws) (65% versus 46%) according to a retrospective, matched-cohort study.[56] The prospective cohorts were matched to the retrospective cohorts according to patient age, fusion levels, Lenke curve type, and operative method. The two groups were not significantly different in regard to age, Lenke AIS curve type, or Riser grade. The numbers of fused vertebrae were significantly different (11.7±1.6 for pedicle screw versus 13.0±1.2 for hybrid group). This study's results may be biased due to the pedicle screw group's being analyzed prospectively versus retrospective analysis of the hybrid instrumentation group.

In general, modern spinal fusions have good outcomes with high degrees of correction and low rates of failure and infection. However a systematic review of PubMed papers in 2008 concluded "Scoliosis surgery has a varying but high rate of complications", although the non-standardised data on complications was difficult to assess and was incomplete.[57] Patients with fused spines and permanent implants tend to have normal lives with unrestricted activities when they are younger; it remains to be seen whether those that have been treated with the newer surgical techniques develop problems as they age.[58]


A complementary surgical procedure a surgeon may recommend is called thoracoplasty (also called costoplasty). This is a procedure to reduce the rib hump that affects most scoliosis patients with a thoracic curve. A rib hump is evidence of some rotational deformity to the spine. Thoracoplasty may also be performed to obtain bone grafts from the ribs instead of the pelvis, regardless of whether a rib hump is present. Thoracoplasty can be performed as part of a spinal fusion or as a separate surgery, entirely.

Thoracoplasty is the removal (or resection) of typically four to six segments of adjacent ribs that protrude. Each segment is one to two inches long. The surgeon decides which ribs to resect based on either their prominence or their likelihood to be realigned by correction of the curvature alone. The ribs grow back straight.

Thoracoplasty has risks, such as increased pain in the rib area during recovery or reduced pulmonary function (10–15% is typical) following surgery. This impairment can last anywhere from a few months to two years. Because thoracoplasty may lengthen the duration of surgery, patients may also lose more blood or develop complications from the prolonged anesthesia. A more significant, though far less common, risk is the surgeon might inadvertently puncture the pleura, a protective coating over the lungs. This could cause blood or air to drain into the chest cavity, haemothorax or pneumothorax, respectively.[59]


The risk of undergoing surgery for scoliosis is estimated to be 5%. Possible complications may be inflammation of the soft tissue or deep inflammatory processes, breathing impairments, bleeding and nerve injuries. However, according to the latest evidence, the rate of complications is far higher. As early as five years after surgery, another 5% require reoperation, and today it is not yet clear what to expect from spine surgery in the long term.[60][61] Taking into account that signs and symptoms of spinal deformity cannot be changed by surgical intervention, surgery remains primarily a cosmetic indication[dubious ], only especially in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the most common form of scoliosis never exceeding 80°.[60][62] However, the cosmetic effects of surgery are not necessarily stable.[60]

If one decides to undergo surgery, a specialized center should be preferred.

Surgery without fusion

New implants that aim to delay spinal fusion and to allow more spinal growth in young children have been developed. For the youngest patients, whose thoracic insufficiency compromises their ability to breathe and applies significant cardiac pressure, ribcage implants that push the ribs apart on the concave side of the curve may be especially useful. These Vertical, Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Ribs (VEPTR) provide the benefit of expanding the thoracic cavity and straightening the spine in all three dimensions while allowing it to grow.[20]

An expandable rod, called a growing rod, may be surgically implanted across the segment of spinal curvature, and lengthened, under surgery, every six months to mimic and maintain normal spine growth.[20] This intervention can halt the progress of curvature and gradually straighten the spine. A magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) system has been developed and is undergoing clinical trials in Hong Kong. This intervention employs a rod that may be expanded by applying strong magnets to the outside of the patient's body, and so does not involve repeated surgeries. The recently published report on the first two children to reach 24 month follow-up (aged 5 and 12 years) is encouraging. Monthly rod lengthening produced a progressive increase in spinal length and correction of scoliosis was maintained.[63][64]

Although these methods are novel and promising, they are suitable only for growing patients with early-onset scoliosis, and have a high complication rate.[20] Spinal fusion remains the "gold standard" of surgical treatment for scoliosis.[65]

History of surgical techniques

Spinal fusions were once performed without metal implants.[citation needed] In this technique, a cast was applied after the surgery, usually under traction, to pull the curve as straight as possible, and then hold it there while fusion took place. Casting left patients largely immobilized for a period of weeks to months, with significant burden on patient quality of life. Additionally, the risk of pseudarthrosis (fusion failure) at one or more levels was relatively high, and significant correction could not always be achieved.

In 1962, Paul Harrington introduced a metal spinal system of instrumentation that assisted with straightening the spine, as well as holding it rigid while fusion took place. The original (now obsolete) Harrington rod operated on a ratchet system, attached by hooks to the spine at the top and bottom of the curvature that when cranked would distract, or straighten, the curve. The Harrington rod represented a major advance in the field, as it obviated the need for prolonged casting, allowing patients greater mobility in the postoperative period and significantly reducing the quality of life burden of fusion surgery. Additionally, as the first system to apply instrumentation directly to the spine, the Harrington rod was the precursor to most modern spinal instrumentation systems. A major shortcoming of the Harrington method was it failed to produce a posture wherein the skull would be in proper alignment with the pelvis, and it did not address rotational deformity. As a result, unfused parts of the spine would try to compensate for this in the effort to stand up straight. As the person aged, there would be increased wear and tear, early-onset arthritis, disc degeneration, muscular stiffness, and pain with eventual reliance on painkillers, further surgery, inability to work full-time, and disability. "Flatback" became the medical name for a related complication, especially for those who had lumbar scoliosis.[65]

In the 1960s, the gold standard for idiopathic scoliosis was a posterior approach using a single Harrington rod. Post-operative recovery involved bed rest, casts, and braces. Poor results became apparent over time.[66]

In the 1970s, an improved technique was developed using of two rods and wires attached at each level of the spine. This segmented instrumentation system allowed patients to become mobile soon after surgery.[66]

In the 1980s, Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation improved fixation and addressed sagittal imbalance and rotational defects unresolved by the Harrington rod system. This technique used multiple hooks with rods to give stronger fixation in three dimensions, usually eliminating the need for post-operative bracing.[66]


The cost of diagnosis involves both monetary losses and lifestyle limitations that increase with severity. Respiratory deficiencies may also arise from thoracic deformities and cause abnormal breathing.[67] This directly affects exercise and work capacity, decreasing the overall quality of life.[68]

In the United States, for cases involving surgical procedures an average cost was $30,000 to $60,000 per patient in 2010.[69] Since scoliosis is diagnosed during rapid growth periods, costs of bracing reaches up to $5,000 as braces must be consistently replaced across multiple routine follow-ups.[68]


A 50-year follow-up study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (2003) asserted the lifelong physical health, including cardiopulmonary and neurological functions, and mental health of idiopathic scoliosis patients are comparable to those of the general population. Scoliosis that interferes with normal systemic functions is "exceptional"[70] and "rare", and "untreated [scoliosis] patients had similar death rates and were just as functional and likely to lead productive lives 50 years after diagnosis as people with normal spines".[71][72] In an earlier University of Iowa follow-up study, 91 percent of idiopathic scoliosis patients displayed normal pulmonary function, and their life expectancy was 2% longer than that of the general population.[6]

Generally, the prognosis of scoliosis depends on the likelihood of progression. The general rules of progression are larger curves carry a higher risk of progression than smaller curves, and thoracic and double primary curves carry a higher risk of progression than single lumbar or thoracolumbar curves. In addition, patients not having yet reached skeletal maturity have a higher likelihood of progression (i.e., if the patient has not yet completed the adolescent growth spurt).[citation needed]


Scoliosis affects 2-3% of the United States population, which is equivalent to about 5 to 9 million cases.[68] A scoliosis spinal column's curve of 10° or less affects 1.5% to 3% of individuals.[47] Children and adolescents accommodate for 85% of those diagnosed, due to rapid growth spurts occurring at puberty when spinal development is most relenting to genetic and environmental influences.[73] Because female adolescents undergo growth spurts before postural musculoskeletal maturity, scoliosis is more prevalent among females.[74] Although fewer cases are present today using Cobb angle analysis for diagnosis, scoliosis remains a prevailing condition, appearing in otherwise healthy children. Incidence of idiopathic scoliosis (IS) stops after puberty when skeletal maturity is reached, however, further curvature may proceed during late adulthood due to vertebral osteoporosis and weakened musculature.[68]


The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) is a professional organization of physicians and allied health personnel. Their primary focus is on providing continuing medical education for healthcare professionals and on funding/supporting research in spinal deformities. Founded in 1966, the SRS has gained recognition as one of the world's premier spine societies. Strict membership criteria ensure the individual Fellows support that commitment. Current membership includes over 1,000 of the world's leading spine surgeons, as well as some researchers, physician assistants, and orthotists who are involved in research and treatment of spinal deformities. The purpose of the society is to foster the optimal care of all patients with spinal deformities.[75]

Evolutionary considerations

A 13-14th century woman who suffered from severe scoliosis, and died at about 35 years, Limburgs Museum Venlo

Idiopathic (spontaneously appearing) scoliosis represents a majority of cases, but its causes are largely unknown. Results of recent studies indicate potential heritability of the disorder. About 38% of variance in scoliosis risk is due to genetic factors, and 62% is due to the environment.[76] The genetics are likely very complex, however, given that we observe inconsistent inheritance and discordance among monozygotic twins.[76] The specific genes that contribute to development of scoliosis have not been conclusively identified. Several candidate gene studies have found associations between idiopathic scoliosis and genes mediating bone formation, bone metabolism, and connective tissue structure.[76] More studies of larger samples, however, are needed to confirm these results. Additionally, several genome-wide studies have identified a number of loci as significantly linked to idiopathic scoliosis.[76]

Scoliosis has not been found in chimpanzees or gorillas.[77] Thus, it has been hypothesized that scoliosis may actually be related to humans’ morphological differences from these apes.[77] Apes have a shorter and less mobile lower spine than humans. Some of the lumbar vertebrae in Pan are “captured” between the ilia, meaning that they are held fast between the bones of the pelvis. Additionally, Old World Monkeys have a far larger erector spinae, which is the muscle that holds the spine steady, than humans.[77] All of these factors make the lumbar spines of most primates less flexible and thus far less likely to deviate than those of humans. While this may only explicitly relate to lumbar appearances of scoliosis, it is possible that small imbalances in the lumbar spine could precipitate thoracic problems as well.[77]

Scoliosis may also be a byproduct of strong selection for bipedalism. There are significant benefits of a highly mobile, elongated lower spine, specifically for a bipedal stance.[77] For instance, the human spine takes on an S-shaped curve with lumbar lordosis, which allows for better balance and support of an upright trunk.[78] This and some of the characteristics described above facilitate bipedality but may make the spine more susceptible to scoliotic curvature. Selection for bipedality was, however, likely strong enough to justify the maintenance of such a disorder. Bipedality is hypothesized to have emerged for a variety of different reasons, many of which would have certainly conferred fitness advantages. It may increase viewing distance, which can be beneficial in hunting and foraging as well as protection from predators or other humans; it makes long distance travel more efficient for foraging or hunting; and it facilitates terrestrial feeding from grasses, trees, and bushes.[79] Given the many benefits of bipedality, and its dependence on a particular spinal morphology, it is likely that selection for bipedalism played a large role in the development of the spine as we see it today, in spite of any resulting potential for “scoliotic deviations.”[77] Moreover, according to the fossil record, earlier hominins, such as Australopithecus and H. erectus, may have exhibited an even greater prevalence of scoliosis as bipedality was first emerging.[77] Analysis of their fossils indicates that there may have been selection over time for a slight reduction in lumbar length to what we see today, suggesting that selection has favored a spine that can efficiently support bipedality with a lower risk of disorder. The links between human spinal morphology, bipedality, and scoliosis harken to a potential evolutionary basis for the condition.

See also


  2. Online Etymology Dictionary. Douglas Harper, Historian. Accessed 27 December 2008.
  3. McAviney, Jeb. "What is scoliosis". ScoliCare Australia. Retrieved 11 February 2014. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 McAviney, Jeb (9/2/14). Never Misdiagnose Scoliosis Again. Australia: Scolicare Chiropractors Assoc Australia. pp. 15–16. 
  5. Health and Function of Patients With Untreated Idiopathic Scoliosis
  6. 6.0 6.1 Idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients [1]
  7. "Fragile X syndrome". Department for Work and Pensions, U.K.. Retrieved 29 August 2011. 
  8. "Orthopaedic aspects of fragile-X syndrome". The National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved 29 August 2011. 
  9. Page 90 in: Elizabeth D Agabegi; Agabegi, Steven S. (2008). Step-Up to Medicine (Step-Up Series). Hagerstwon, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 0-7817-7153-6. 
  10. Kouwenhoven JW, Castelein RM (2008). "The pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review of the literature". Spine 33 (26): 2898–2908. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181891751. PMID 19092622. 
  11. 11.0 11.1 Ogilvie JW, Braun J, Argyle V, Nelson L, Meade M, Ward K (2006). "The search for idiopathic scoliosis genes". Spine 31 (6): 679–681. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000202527.25356.90. PMID 16540873. 
  12. Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children
  13. Lucio Montanaro, Patrizio Parisini, Tiziana Greggi, Mario Di Silvestre, Davide Campoccia, Simona Rizzi and Carla R. Arciola (2006). "Evidence of a linkage between matrilin-1 gene (MATN1) and idiopathic scoliosis". Scoliosis 1: 21. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-1-21. PMID 17176459. 
  14. "What is Scoliosis: What Causes Scoliosis?". MedicalBug. 17 February 2012. Retrieved 18 March 2012. 
  15. Scoliosis Research Society. (2014). Congenital Scoliosis. Scoliosis Research Society.
  16. Trontelj, J., Pecak, F., & Dimitrijevic, M. (1979). Segmental Neurophysiological Mechanisms in Scoliosis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Vol. 61-B, No. 3. HighWire.
  17. POSNA. (2014). Neuromuscular Scoliosis. The Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America.
  18. "Scoliosis symptoms — pain, flat back, screening, self-assessment". 
  19. "Scoliometer (Inclinometer)". National Scoliosis Foundation. 
  20. 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 20.6 20.7 M. Stenning, I. Nelson (2011). "Recent advances in the treatment of scoliosis in children". British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery. Retrieved 1 January 2014. 
  21. Ogilvie J (2010). "Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and genetic testing". Current Opinion in Pediatrics 22 (1): 67–70. doi:10.1097/MOP.0b013e32833419ac. PMID 19949338. 
  22. "Treating scoliosis in children". NHS Choices. 19 February 2013. Retrieved 14 May 2014. 
  23. "Scoliosis - Treatment in adults". NHS Choices. 19 February 2013. Retrieved 14 May 2014. 
  24. "Idiopathic Scoliosis - Adult Nonoperative Management". Scoliosis Research Society. Retrieved 14 May 2014. 
  25. "Idiopathic Scoliosis - Adult Surgical Treatment". Scoliosis Research Society. Retrieved 14 May 2014. 
  26. Negrini S, Fusco C, Minozzi S, Atanasio S, Zaina F, Romano M (2008). "Exercises reduce the progression rate of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results of a comprehensive systematic review of the literature". Disability and Rehabilitation 30 (10): 772–785. doi:10.1080/09638280801889568. PMID 18432435. 
  27. DeWald, RL (2003). Spinal Deformitities: The Comprehensive Text. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 
  28. Bulthuis G.J., Veldhuizen A.G., Nijenbanning G. (2008). "Clinical effect of continuous corrective force delivery in the non-operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective cohort study of the triac-brace". European Spine Journal 17 (2): 231–239. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0513-9. PMID 17926071. 
  29. 29.0 29.1 Green BN, Johson C, Moreau C. (2009). "Is physical activity contraindicated for individuals with scoliosis? A systematic literature review". Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 8 (1): 25–37. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2008.11.001. PMID 19646383. 
  30. Paris MJ, Lang G, Benjamin MJ, Wilcox R. (2008). Standard of Care: Marfan Syndrome. Brigham and Womans Hospital. 
  31. Vaughn, D. and Brown, E. (2007). The Influence of an In-home Based Theraputic Exercise Program on Thoracic Kyphosis Angles. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 20(4), 155-165.
  32. Pavlu, D., Panek, D. (2009). Resistance Exercise for Prevention of Trunk Deformities. Scoliosis, 2(4),1-11.
  33. 33.0 33.1 33.2 Burd TA, Pawelek L, Lenke LG. (2008). "Upper Extremity Functional Assessment After Anterior Spinal Fusion via Thoracotomy for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Prospective Study of Twenty-Five Patients". Spine 27 (1): 65–71. doi:10.1097/00007632-200201010-00016. PMID 11805638. 
  34. Voda S. (2009). "Dangerous Curves: Treating adult idiopathic scoliosis". Nursing 39 (12): 42–6. doi:10.1097/01.NURSE.0000365025.40773.4c (inactive 12 May 2010). PMID 19934743. 
  35. Weiss H.F. (2003). "Rehabilitation of adolescent patients with scoliosis – What do we know? A review of the literature". Pediatric Rehabilitation 6 (3): 183–194. doi:10.1080/13638490310001636790. 
  36. 36.0 36.1 36.2 Radomski, M.V. (2008). Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction sixth edition.. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 964. ISBN 978-0-7817-6312-7. 
  37. 37.0 37.1 37.2 Rigby, P.J. (2009). Assistive technology for persons with physical disabilities: Evaluation and outcomes Thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-90-393-5041-6. 
  38. Salter K, Jutai J, Teasell R, Foley NC, Bitensky J, Bayley M. (2010). "Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity". Disability and Rehabilitation 27 (6): 315–340. doi:10.1080/09638280400008545. PMID 16040533. 
  39. Telfer‌ S., Solomonidis S., Spence W. (2009). "An investigation of teaching staff members' and parents' views on the current state of adaptive seating technology and provision". Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 5 (1): 14–24. doi:10.3109/17483100903191334. PMID 19941437. 
  40. Richardson M & Frank A.O. (2009). "Electric powered wheelchairs for those with muscular dystrophy: problems of posture, pain and deformity". Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 4 (3): 181–188. doi:10.1080/17483100802543114. 
  41. Mandal A C 1996: Balanced Sitting Posture on Forward Sloping Seat
  42. Mandal T 2009: Better furniture types for work and studies reduces bending and pain. Association for Body Conscious Design
  43. Wood, Grant (2013) Published in the Academy Today (The Edge) by the American Academy of Orthosits and Prosthetist. To Brace or Not to Brace: The Three-Dimensional Nature and Growth Considerations for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, July 2013 edition pages 5 – 8,
  44. Negrini S, et al. Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment, SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. 2011. . Accessed January 27, 2013.
  45. adolescents/surgical_treatment.htm. Accessed January 27, 2013
  46. Wood, G.I. (2013), Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT): The Cheneau Brace using Rigo Principles and the Wood Cheneau Rigo (WCR) Brace. Chicago, IL.
  47. 47.0 47.1 Herring JA (2002). Tachdjian's Pediatric Orthopaedics. Philadelphia PA: W.B. Saunders. ISBN 0-7216-5684-6. Template:Page needed
  48. Weiss HR: Best Practice in conservative scoliosis care. Pflaum Company, 3rd. edition, Munich 2010Template:Page needed
  49. Weiss HR, Werkmann M, Stephan C (2007). "Correction effects of the ScoliOlogiC® "Chêneau light" brace in patients with scoliosis". Scoliosis 2: 2. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-2-2. PMID 17257399. 
  50. Weiss HR, Werkmann M, Stephan C (2007). "Brace related stress in scoliosis patients – Comparison of different concepts of bracing". Scoliosis 2: 10. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-2-10. PMID 17708766. 
  51. "NIH study establishes benefits of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis". National Institutes of Health. 19 September 2013. Retrieved 8 April 2014. 
  52. "Bracing is effective in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis, study suggests". ScienceDaily. 19 September 2013. Retrieved 8 April 2014. 
  53. Mehta MH (2005). "Growth as a corrective force in the early treatment of progressive infantile scoliosis". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 87 (9): 1237–1247. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.16124. PMID 16129750. 
  54. Derotational casting for progressive infantile scoliosis, Sanders JO, D’Astous J, Fitzgerald M, Khoury JG, Kishan S, Sturm PF, J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Sep;29(6):581-7.
  55. Casting and Traction Treatment Methods for Scoliosis, Jacques L. D’Astous, James O. Sanders,
  56. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J et al. (2006). "Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis". Spine 31 (3): 291–298. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000197865.20803.d4. PMID 16449901. 
  57. Weiss HR, Goodall D (2008). "The treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) according to present evidence. A systematic review". European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 44 (2): 177–93. PMID 18418338. 
  58. Weill Cornell Neurological Surgery – Surgical Services. Retrieved on 2011-01-16.
  59. Web site. Used with permission.
  60. 60.0 60.1 60.2 Hawes M (2006). "Impact of spine surgery on signs and symptoms of spinal deformity". Pediatric Rehabilitation 9 (4): 318–39. doi:10.1080/13638490500402264. PMID 17111548. 
  61. Weiss HR, Goodall D (2008). "Rate of complications in scoliosis surgery – a systematic review of the Pub Med literature". Scoliosis 3: 9. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-3-9. PMID 18681956. 
  62. Hawes MC, O'Brien JP (2008). "A century of spine surgery: what can patients expect?". Disability and Rehabilitation 30 (10): 808–817. doi:10.1080/09638280801889972. PMID 18432439. 
  63. Cheung KM, Cheung JP, Samartzis D, et al. (May 2012). "Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: a prospective case series". Lancet 379 (9830): 1967–74. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60112-3. PMID 22520264. 
  64. Smith JT, Campbell RM (May 2012). "Magnetically controlled growing rods for spinal deformity". Lancet 379 (9830): 1930–1. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60528-5. PMID 22520263. 
  65. 65.0 65.1 Scoliosis Surgery. Retrieved on 2011-01-16.
  66. 66.0 66.1 66.2 Keith Bridwell (8 February 2013). "Idiopathic Scoliosis: Options of Fixation and Fusion of Thoracic Curves". SpineUniverse. Retrieved 21 May 2014. 
  67. Larson, N. (2011). Early onset scoliosis: What the primary care provider needs to know and implications for practice. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 23, 392-403.
  68. 68.0 68.1 68.2 68.3 Negrini, S., Aulisa, A.G., Aulisa, L., Circo, A.B., Claude de Mauroy, J., Durmala, J., Grivas, T.B., Knott, P., Kotwicki, T., Maruyama, T., Minozzi, S., O’Brien, J.P., Papadopoulos,D., Rigo, M., Rivard, C.H., Romano, M., Wynne, J.H., Villagrasa, M., Weiss, H., Zaina, F. (2012). 2011 SOSORT guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis, 7 (3), 1-35.
  69. Kamerlink, J., Quirno, M., Auerbach, J., Milby, A., Windsor, L., Dean, L., Dryer, J., Errico, T., Lonner, B. (2010). Hospital cost analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery in 125 consecutive cases. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 92-A (5), 1097-1104.
  70. Health and Function of Patients With Untreated Idiopathic Scoliosis—Reply [2]
  71. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Spratt KF, Peterson KK, Spoonamore MJ, Ponseti IV. (2003). "Health and Function of Patients With Untreated Idiopathic Scoliosis: A 50-Year Natural History Study.". JAMA. 289 (5): 559–567.. doi:10.1001/jama.289.5.559. 
  72. Many With Scoliosis Can Skip Treatments
  73. Edery, P., Margaritte-Jeannin, P., Biot, B., Labalme, A., Bernard, J., Chastang, J., Kassai, B., Plais, M., Moldovan, Fl., Clerget-Darpoux, F. (2011). New disease gene location and high genetic heterogeneity in idiopathic scoliosis. European Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 865-869.
  74. Burwell, R.G. (2003). Aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current concepts. Pedriatric Rehabilitation, 6 (3-4), 137-170.
  75. Scoliosis Research Society website
  76. 76.0 76.1 76.2 76.3 Gorman, Kristen Fay; Julien, Cédric; Moreau, Alain (14 June 2012). "The genetic epidemiology of idiopathic scoliosis". European Spine Journal 21 (10): 1905–1919. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2389-6. 
  77. 77.0 77.1 77.2 77.3 77.4 77.5 77.6 Lovejoy OC (Jan 2005). "The natural history of human gait and posture: Part 1. Spine and pelvis." Gait & Posture 21 (1): 95-112.
  78. Harcourt-Smith, William E (2007). Handbook of Paleoanthropology. Chapter 5: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 1483–1518. 
  79. Hunt, Kevin D (March 1994). "The evolution of human bipedality: ecology and functional morphology". Journal of Human Evolution 26 (3): 182–202. 

External links

  • Scoliosis Australia, is a project of the Spine Society of Australia, an Affiliate of the Australian Orthopaedic Association. The website provides comprehensive information about scoliosis and how to self-detect for scoliosis. A supportive discussion forum is available.
  • SCOLIOSIS LIBRARY Current Scoliosis Reference Files
  • Early Onset Scoliosis Early Onset Scoliosis is the abnormal, side-to-side curve of spine in children under 5 years old, often including children with congenital scoliosis (present at birth, with spine abnormalities) and infantile scoliosis (birth to 3 years).

Template:Congenital malformations and deformations of musculoskeletal system